By the same token, the .22-250 Remington is well known for excellent accuracy across a wide range of loads. Even though they both have the same overall length and rim diameter, the .204 Ruger has a slightly greater case capacity than the .223 Remington due to the slightly longer case length (1.85″ vs 1.76″) and steeper shoulder angle (30 degrees vs 23 degrees) of the .204 Ruger. After many trips to the Dakota’s prairie dog hunting and many many round’s fired through the Swift it was time for a new barrel. 223 ballistics chart243 ballistics chart. This makes the .223 Remington a better choice than the others for hunting larger game. Cartridge Type: RifleHeight: 1.84"Width: 0.378"Average FPS: 3935Average Energy: 1272Average Gr: 37Recoil: 0.6Power Rank: 1.46 of 20. The .220 Swift also initially gained a reputation as a barrel-burner, which further limited the appeal of the cartridge. Good luck with your .220 Swift! John. Both carry approximately the same energy at comparable distances while the .223 offers a larger diameter. However, as we’ll discuss in a minute, the .22-250 Remington has massive advantages when it comes to ammo and rifle availability. It’s also available in the Ruger Mini-Fourteen. Greetings, Very comprehensive article. The .223 and .22-250 are also available in a few loads designed for big game hunting like the Barnes VOR-TX and the Nosler Partition. Fantastic cartridge and not to be underrated! The .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift have a significantly flatter trajectory are more resistance to wind drift than the .223 Remington, so they have a definite advantage as ranges increase as well as in windy conditions. On the other hand, the .22-250 Remington is a larger rimless cartridge with a .473″ (12mm) rim diameter and the .220 Swift is a semi-rimmed cartridge that also has a .473″ (12mm) rim diameter. Since it uses a much less common .204″ bullet diameter, the .204 Ruger doesn’t have quite the variety of ammunition as the others, but there’s still a good selection of varmint ammo in the cartridge. The ballistics chart below compares the trajectory of .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift loads each firing … Nosler Accubonds and match bullets probably the best. Buy some quality .204 Ruger hunting ammo here. I had to finish off animals shot with the other calibres ( chest shots) as they did not go down immediately. That being said, the advent of better quality bullets has made the .22 caliber centerfires much more effective big game hunting than they used to be. Furthermore, those loads achieve that performance with virtually no recoil and while burning significantly less powder than the .22-250 and .220 Swift. perform in all weather types such as rain, dust, or snow. Consistently ranking among the Top 5 or Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year, the .223 Remington is by far the most popular of the group. This is why you can order a Remington R-15 in .204 Ruger as well as .223 Rem. The .204 Ruger is considered to be accurate on distances up to 270 yards. It’s not nearly as common as it used to be, but it’s still possible to find factory ammo in the cartridge. Are you looking for an ideal cartridge to use in an AR-15 platform? All 3 are fun to shoot and challenging to find a specific load that works best in each one. The .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent varmint cartridges. Ammo Description Velocity (fps) Energy (ft/lb) Trajectory Tables (inches) CARTRIDGE BULLET ITEM # MUZ 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 400 yd 500 yd MUZ 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 400 yd 500 yd MUZ 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 400 yd 500 yd M 223 Rem 68 gr. While that’s true to a certain degree, it actually drifts less than the .223 Remington. This is a .223 ballistics chart (external) generated using our ballistic trajectory calculator. For a detailed discussion about another high velocity .22 caliber cartridge in the .224 Valkyrie, read the article below: The Lyman 50th Edition (p122-123, 139-143, 148-151, 154-156), Hornady 10th Edition (p136-138, 160-178, 200-209, 210-215), and Speer Number 10 (p120-123, 134-141) reloading manuals as well as The Rifle In America by Philip B. Sharpe (p712-713) were used as references for the history of the cartridges. Among others, the Barnes Varmint Grenade, the Berger Varmint HP, the Hornady NTX and V-Max, the Nosler Ballistic Tip and Varmageddon, and the Remington AccuTip V are available in .204 caliber bullets. I'm just looking for some informed opinions on … At one time, Ruger produced both their No. Along those same lines, the .204 Ruger also uses lighter bullets in the 24-45 grain range with 24, 32, 40 grain bullets being most popular. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .223 Remington vs .243 Winchester ammo rounds. Like the .223 Remington, the .204 Ruger is also descended from the .222 Remington. However, the .204 Ruger is necked down to .204″ (5.2mm). Sure don't know that from experience though. The PowerRank is an estimation of the cartridge power. I decided to go to a faster twist 1:12 vs 1:14 which original factory was. from a 24" test barrel. Clearly, the .22-250 is a better tool for taking shots at extreme ranges than either the .223 Rem. It will handle all velocities from about 1500 up to 4500 and the performance of most of the other standard and wildcat cartridges can be equaled. Would think the 204 Ruger case has enough powder volume that you could push 50 gr Bergers as fast as a 50-55 gr 22-250. If your preference is a black rifle, the choice is between .223 and .204. The first number is the value of this cartridge, and the last number is the value of the most powerful round in our bullet database. As expected, each of the large bores turned the water jugs inside out in spectacular fashion – albeit with significant recoil (the .458 was the mildest, owing to the heavy weight of the stock and action). While none are really good choices for extreme long range shooting, all of these cartridges are highly regarded for their accuracy. The .223 Remington wins over the .222 and its larger rival, the .22-250 in good ballistics with the minimum of powder and maximum efficiency. I'm gonna go with a .204 or .223, but I'm leaning towards the .204 for it's ballistics. On the other hand, the .223 has the most wind drift and most arching trajectory of the four cartridges when using 55gr bullets. Pushing a 55gr bullet at around 3,300fps (1,330 foot pounds of energy), the .223 Remington couldn’t quite match the paper performance of the .220 Swift and .22-250 Remington. Please note. Respect the animal! Even though Winchester opted not to utilize the .250 Savage as the basis for the .220 Swift, many wildcatters continued to neck the Savage case down to .22 caliber over the ensuing decades. We all remarked and examined the carcass, deciding that the bullet must have self-destructed upon contact with the water. All four loads used a 200 yard zero.As you can see, they’re all relatively flat shooting cartridges. Of course, I critically weighed every charge, and was very careful in prepping the cases. This results in a cartridge with even less recoil and report, but with a much higher velocity. I also upgraded to a stainless fluted 26″barrel from Lija Precision Barrels. I have a Ruger 77 in .204 Ruger, a Savage 10 in 22/250, a heavy barrel DPMs in .223 with a 1in9 twist, and a Ruger 77 in 220 Swift. Pretty devastating round. Winchester eventually ceased production of the cartridge in 1964 when the company began manufacturing their redesigned Model 70. The .223 performance. Here is a copy of the Hornady ballistics chart, it may help you decide. But AR-15s are chambered for the .204. After reading your article I think I am going with the 220 Swift. While we have went to great lengths to make sure that it's as accurate as possible this rendering should not be used to generate specs for casings. Finally, they all have different SAAMI maximum average pressure levels: 55,000psi for the .223 Remington, 57,500psi for the .204 Ruger, 62,000psi for the .220 Swift, and 65,000psi for the .22-250 Remington. Federal’s testing shows that 69-grain .223 Remington Gold Medal Sierra MatchKing (SMK) will go subsonic and lose its stability at 775 yards with a 24-inch … That’s why, in a move similar to what they did with the .25-06 Rem, the Remington Arms Company eventually standardized the cartridge as the .22-250 Remington in 1965. In addition to the impressive external ballistics of the cartridge, the .220 Swift also exhibited devastating terminal performance on small game like woodchucks/groundhogs, prairie dogs, coyotes, foxes, etc. My hand loads running a 39gn Sierra blitzking on 26.5gn of ADI AR2206H will consistently shoot under .5 moa 5 shot groups at 100 metres. The .204 Ruger However, a couple of factors have substantially increased barrel life in .220 Swift rifles in recent years though. Not surprisingly, the .22 Varminter was extremely well liked among varmint hunters and the Varminter ended up surpassing the Swift in popularity before it was officially standardized. Are you looking for a cartridge with lots of inexpensive ammo for general plinking or target shooting? While all three other cartridges are virtually non-existent in semi-automatic rifles, the .223 Remington is extremely popular in semi-auto platforms. The Velocity Edge--A .204 Ruger drives a 40-grainer 600 fps faster than a .223 Rem can push the typical 22-Caliber 50gr bullet. individual firearm may vary from test barrel results. Buy an outstanding .223 Remington hunting rifle here. 0.0 indicates yardage at which firearm was sighted in. However, the .204 Ruger is in a completely different league from the others with less than half the recoil of the .220 Swift. I like shooting the heavier grain bullet for windy days in the Dakota’s. The Big Game Hunting Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.com.au, and other Amazon stores worldwide. All four cartridges are well suited for handloaders and reloading components are widely available. As I recall, the load pushed about 4,400 f/s – even though on inspection, there was no evidence whatever of flattened primer or high pressure signals. The .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift are very close to each other in almost all performance categories. The .204 Ruger is not well suited for big game hunting at all. Each one prints a .5 MOA group or less with the right loads. Run the numbers and you'll see--a 40-grainer shot from a .204 Ruger has less drop AND less wind drift than a 40gr or 50gr bullet fired from a .223 Rem. the 32 V-Max, 40 , 45 grain are 4,225 ft/s (32 gr), 3,900 ft/s (40 gr), and 3,625 ft/s (45 gr). It will be as good or better than a 220 Swift at 3800 fps w/55's. To get that tack driving accuracy I believe you must work up a handload for the Swift. This makes it a good choice Shooting an 87 grain .257″ bullet, the .250/3000 Savage cartridge developed by Charles Newton and officially introduced by Savage in 1913 was the first commercially available round to break the 3,000fps barrier. Hornady V-Max using IMR 4064 powder. I also have a 204 and a 22-250 both in Savage M12’s that I take along on prairie dog hunts. On the downside, the .204 Ruger is indeed more vulnerable to wind drift than the .22-250 and .220 Swift (but not the .223) and does not retain energy nearly as well as the others. My use for these is the 204 Ruger is what my wife uses for high volume shooting. I have killed deer with my .223 but prefer something bigger. Buy some of the best .223 Remington hunting ammo here. John, Great article, great comparisons. Prices and availability vary from region to region, but the .223 Remington is by far the most common and least expensive. Efficiency, for sure. In my testing, the .223’s velocity was 128-fps faster on average at 50 yards. Especially when shooters allow their barrels to properly cool between shot strings, barrel life is not nearly as big of a concern as it was in past decades. With just 29 grains of TAC powder the .204 can spit a 32-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip 4,150 fps from a 26-inch barrel. This was easily the fastest commercial load in the world at the time. Since the wildcat cartridge was already quite popular, the .22-250 was a major commercial success after Remington opened up a whole new market segment by manufacturing their Model 700 rifle in the cartridge and selling factory .22-250 ammo. I found this article very interesting, very balanced, and well thought-out. This new cartridge from Federal is designed for speed at long range. Similar to the case with ammunition, rifles chambered in .223 Remington are the most common, followed by the .22-250, the .204 Ruger, and finally the .220 Swift. help make it a popular centerfire cartridge. How to Sight in a Scope - Step by Step Guide. or .204 … You'll find the data in the chart below. The table below compares the recoil produced by those cartridges when fired from 8.5 pound varmint rifles: a Remington Model 700 SPS Varmint for the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, and .22-250 Remington and a Model 700 Varmint SF for the .220 Swift. This does come at the expense of more (though not excessive) recoil and muzzle blast though. The .224″ bullets used by the .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are also used by their Ackley Improved cousins as well as other cartridges like the .218 Bee, the .219 Zipper, the .221 Fireball, the 22 Creedmoor, the .22 PPC, the .222 Remington Magnum, the .223 WSSM, the .224 Valkyrie, and the .224 Weatherby Magnum. Case capacities for the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift were obtained from Nosler. Since most rifles chambered in .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift have 1:14″ rifling twists, they have trouble stabilizing heavier bullets. Barnes, Hornady, and Nosler manufacture .224″ TTSX, GMX, E-Tip, and Partition bullets and there’s nothing stopping handloaders from making custom loads using them. 204 Ruger Ballistics. The .22-250 Remington was known for exceptional accuracy and very mild recoil from the start. This often resulted in a horrific surface wound that was not immediately fatal. That sounds like impressive performance you got out of your .220 Swift! For one thing, advances in barrel metallurgy since the 1930s have resulted in more durable rifle barrels. “Fast, flat and not fat, the .204 Ruger generally leaves one nice little hole,” said native Texan and Idaho guide and outfitter Brooks Murphy, who has hunted more than his fair share of pint-sized predators … If you don't own a Remington .204 Ruger with a 6-20 Leupold and don't say it is the best cartridge, or ".204 Ruger caliber" in his case, and in every way trumps a .223 at any range with any bullet while looking at Remington factory ballistics comparing two vastly different bullets to fuel his "argument", I … at … I am a fan of the 220 Swift and have shot a Ruger 77 since 1981. The .223 Remington is the only real choice here and there are countless good quality AR-15 style rifles chambered in .223 Remington or 5.56x45mm NATO. Since the .223, .22-250, and .220 Swift all use .224 cal bullets, virtually every major style of varmint bullet is available in all three cartridges: the Barnes Varmint Grenade, the Berger Varmint HP, the Hornady NTX, Varmint, and V-Max, the Nosler Ballistic Tip and Varmageddon, the Remington AccuTip V, and the Speer TNT (just to name a few). The 220 Swift I have no experience with yet. The 204 will have a flatter trajectory and less wind drift than the 22-250. Additionally, manufacturers now usually load factory .220 Swift ammo at slightly lower pressures (more on this in a minute). Red Oak, White, or Chestnut for Deer Herd? For instance, the Hornady Varmint Express factory loads for the .220 Swift and .22-250 Rem have identical ballistics shooting the same 55gr V-Max bullet at 3,680fps. The .223 I see as a general purpose round which can do it all just not quite as much reach. I was going to buy thr 204. so thanks for helping make up my mine. However, Winchester produced large numbers of Model 70 rifles in .220 Swift after replacing the Model 54 with the Model 70 in 1936. The rifles were the Model 77, a Remington 742 in .30-06, an exquisitely-stocked custom Mauser in .375 H&H, and my .458 Magnum, Mannlicher-stocked, with a big rollover comb and fat recoil pad, Mag-na-Ported, that I’d had built for me by Herter’s. This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. However, due to the faster rifling twist normally found on rifles chambered in .223 Remington, it can accurately shoot longer and heavier bullets than the other cartridges. I must however disagree with the point about not using these calibers on animals the size of red deer and elk. The .204 Ruger and .220 Swift data was obtained using 26″ barrels while the .223 Remington and .22-250 Remington used a 24″ barrel length. Glad you enjoyed the article Michael! One of these days Hornady, Sierra, Nosler is going to come out with a 20 cal polymer tipped bullet in 55-60 grains that will be a PD's worst … Since they’re both descended from the .222 Remington cartridge, the .204 Ruger and .223 Remington both are rimless cartridges with a .378″ (9.6mm) rim diameter. The rifle has been tricked up a bit with an aftermarket trigger and a glass bedded thumb hole stock and shoots like a dream. The .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all very accurate, flat shooting, and high velocity cartridges. There’s also a much bigger supply of .223 Remington factory ammo suitable for big game hunting (like the Barnes VOR-TX, the Hornady GMX, and the Nosler E-Tip and Partition) than any of the other cartridges. The resulting cartridge, known as the .22 Varminter, was also extremely effective on varmints. The .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, and .22-250 Remington are all very easy to find in bolt-action hunting rifles like the Browning X-Bolt (223 & 22-250), CZ 527 (204 & 223), Mossberg Patriot (223 & 22-250), Remington 700, Ruger American, Ruger Hawkeye, Savage 110, Tikka T3x, and Weatherby Vanguard (223 & 22-250). The .204 Ruger is especially great for small creatures like prairie dogs and foxes, though it will certainly do the job on coyotes as well. They’re all high velocity, flat shooting cartridges, but the .204 Ruger has the least arching trajectory of the bunch. Ballistics Coefficients - Rifle 1032 .204 32 BlitzKing .110 .221 @ 3950 fps and above.218 between 3625 and 3950 fps.204 between 3300 and 3625 fps.189 between 2225 and 3300 fps.179 between 1750 and 2225 fps.175 @ 1750 fps and below 1039 .204 39 BlitzKing .134 .287 at 3600 fps and above.270 between 3600 … I think the only part that would have been left of a prairie dog would have been the pawprints. At this time, the .204 Ruger is the only cartridge in mass production using .204″ bullets, so bullets of that aren’t nearly as widespread. I actually own and use three of those rounds and have just gotten a Swift. ground hogs. The data used to compare the trajectory and wind drift of the cartridges was obtained from Hornady. for varmint hunting such as prairie dogs, ground squirrels, and small game. The .22-250 Remington is the next most common. The cartridge is a centerfirerifle shell casing based off the .222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle primer. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .22-250 Remington vs .223 Remington ammo rounds. However, I generally discourage the average hunter from taking those shots (no offense whatsoever to you) and instead recommend aiming for the heart/lungs. I bought a Ruger 77 in .220 back in the ’70’s. The vast majority of predator and varmint hunters probably agree the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent cartridges for pest control. Specifically, the table shows a 32 gr V-Max (.210 BC) in .204 Ruger and 55 gr V-Max (.255 BC) loads in .223 Remington and .22-250 Remington. It sounds like you and I are both in agreement that there are many other cartridges better suited for taking those shots on big game animals than the smaller .22 caliber cartridges as well. This means I will earn a small commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase. As I’ve stated before: the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent rifle cartridges. The .204 Ruger was designed in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers. Copyright © 2020 Big Game Hunting Adventures LLC | All Rights Reserved, 6mm CREEDMOOR: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW, 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf: Battle Of The Big Bore AR Cartridges. In particular, AR-15 style rifles like those made by Bushmaster, CMMG, Daniel Defense, DPMS, Noveske, and Wilson Combat, are extremely common with the .223 Remington. The ballistic performance based off The bolt action models are known to have a good track record for sport shooting due to being able to Of these, 50 grain, 55 grain, 62 grain, and to a lesser extent, 75 and 77 grain bullet weights are most common. As you’d likely expect from looking the cartridges themselves, there are some significant differences in the ballistics of the cartridges. 224 Valkyrie: Breaking Down the Numbers . So needless to say your article caught my eye when you were comparing these different calibers. The velocity and energy figures down range are 3583 fps and 941 ft. lbs. the rifle popular among enthusiasts who wish to field test their shooting skills on varmints such as (here, here, and here for the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, and .22-250 Remington and p214 of the Hornady Reloading Manual for the .220 Swift). Philip B. Sharpe said it best in his book The Complete Guide to Handloading (second revision of the third edition, p190 & 192): The .220 Swift was not as flexible as had been anticipated and performed best when loaded to approximately the full velocity…The Varminter case is amazing in that it permits the most flexible loading ever recorded with a single cartridge. Like our previous data on the 17 HMR, I shot five rounds thru our Oehler Model 33 Chronograph, recorded the results, then cut 1 inch from the barrel and recrowned to repeat the velocity test. For those same reasons, the .223 Remington is clearly the better choice for practical shooting competitions. The cartridge is a centerfire I’ve owned rifles chambered in .223 for years and have found it to be a very versatile cartridge and a pleasure to shoot. They also aren’t rare by any stretch of the imagination either and there are some good quality bullets to choose from. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift loads out to 500 yards.Once again, the .220 Swift has a very slight edge over the .22-250 here. The rest are honestly just borderline big game hunting rounds and aren’t legal for deer hunting in many states. By and large, most bullets used in the early days of the cartridge were simply too fragile and quickly fragmented at the high impact velocities common with the .220 Swift. public version of the .204 Ruger are slower, but still in the upper echelon of ft/s making that continue to It consistently will shoot .65 MOA 5 shot groups at 100 yds. However, since the differences between them (22-250 vs 223 vs 204 Ruger vs 220 Swift) are pretty big in certain areas, there are definite advantages to using one over the others in various situations. It also has a better selection of ammunition and rifles than the .204 Ruger, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift. When combined with lighter, smaller diameter bullets, new cartridges using smokeless propellant like the 7mm Mauser, .30-40 Krag, and .30-06 Springfield led the way out of the black powder era and offered massive increases in velocity over common black powder cartridges of the day like the .38-55 Winchester, the .44-40 Winchester, and the .45-70 Government. Component Economy and Barrel Life--All the Twenties burn way less powder than a 22-250, and the smaller Twenties use less powder than a .223 … It is hotter than a .222 but not as hot as a .22-250, so there should be no worry about barrel wear and reduced life. I have just started shooting with a 220 swift. That being said, the .22-250 Remington and, to a lesser extent, the .220 Swift can also work in this role. However, each one has different strengths and weaknesses. 220 Swift vs 22-250 vs 223 vs 204 Ruger Ballistics As you’d likely expect from looking the cartridges themselves, there are some significant differences in the ballistics of the cartridges. Due to the wide variety of semi-auto rifles and large supply of ammunition designed specifically for the task, the .223 Remington also has a major advantage here. The .223 I load from 69-77 grain loads for it and the DPMS is not picky and shoots them all on top of each other from various brands. I believe that for a competant marksman these smaller .22 calibres do the job admireably. For this reason, many hunters ended up wounding and not retrieving big game shot with the Swift. I have both calibers and quite honestly prefer the 204 over the 223. the 223 is more readily available as loaded ammo, but components are out there for both if you reload. In this chart I lowered the velocity to compensate for a 20 inch barrel instead of the 24 inch barrel listed: Do not try to shoot 5.56 in a 22-250. It also has has significantly less recoil than the .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift, which really says something because they are all mild shooting cartridges. Buy some great .22-250 Remington hunting ammo here. This is particularly true when shooting a heavy barrel varmint rifle. Based off a standard 55gr bullet leaving the barrel at 3,215fps and follows the bullet trajectry all the way to 1000 yards in steps of 50 yard increments. But this is a tad misleading because the .223 loses velocity much faster than the .224. It’s quite interesting to to see facts on velocities and trajectories rather than the rifle owners biased opinion about “my gun shoots better and further than yours” story. Go to the Hornady website and run a balistic chart for 204 at 3800 fps w/39 sbk's and compare to 22-250 at 3650 w/55 grain btip's. Basically, it has only a little more recoil than rimfire cartridges like the .17 HMR, but is significantly more powerful. This load at 1,000 yards drops 480.2 inches (five feet less than the .223 above). Though Winchester attempted to phase the .220 Swift out back in 1964 and replace it with the .225 Winchester (.225 Win), the Swift is still hanging around. 204 r uger v elocity d ata "For these tests I chose a T/C Contender in 24" length as a starting point. Comparison of same bullet weight loads (50, 55 and 60 grains) for the .223 Rem. I agree in you assessment that these calibers are suitable for taking big game with a brain/spine shot. While some hunters prefer using the larger .22 caliber centerfires on coyotes, it’s really just a matter of personal preference. On the other hand, pretty much every ammunition manufacturer of note like Armscor, American Eagle, Barnes, Black Hills, Browning, Double Tap, Federal, Fiocchi, Hornady, HSM, Nosler, PPU, Remington, Sierra, Sellier & Bellot, and Winchester (just to name a few) produce a wide variety of ammo for both the .223 and .22-250 Remington. Are you very sensitive to recoil? The .220 Swift was also available for a short period of time in the Winchester Model 54 rifle. As you can see in the photo below, there are some pretty major differences between the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift cartridges. In this article, I’m going to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the 22-250 vs 223 vs 204 Ruger vs 220 Swift in order to give you the information necessary to choose the right one for your needs. BTHP 80289 2960 2697 2449 2215 1993 1786 1323 1098 906 741 600 482 -1 517 0-7 -22 -454 M 223 … The fact of the matter is that those lightweight bullets used by all four cartridges also have a relatively low ballistic coefficient, both of which make them more prone to wind drift than many other cartridges. The .223 Remington wins hands down here since it’s arguably the easiest to find and least expensive centerfire cartridge in the United States. 6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor: Which 6.5 Cartridge Is Right For You? John. Federal, Hornady, Jamison, HSM, Norma, Remington, and Winchester all currently manufacture .220 Swift ammo. I purchased a 220 Swift in a Ruger M77V in early 80’s. Buy a really nice .204 Ruger hunting rifle here. Grosvenor Wotkyns (of .22 Hornet fame) took things a step further by necking down the .250/3000 Savage to .22 caliber. Thanks for your comment George! Use this load at your own risk. Thanks for your support. This is particularly true with the .204 Ruger, which requires just over 4″ of holdover at 300 yards with a 200 yard zero. Though it took awhile for hunters to fully appreciate the flat shooting characteristics of the cartridge, the .220 Swift was relatively successful from the start. The US Military was searching for a replacement for the relatively new M-14 rifle and 7.62x51mm cartridge during that same general timeframe. The 204 in a 39 grain bullet will actually be effected less than a 40 grain .224 caliber bullet due to the higher BC. When used in a quality rifle by a skilled shooter, they’re all capable of tack driving accuracy. Excellent article John! "One requirement for this new military cartridge was that the bullet would remain supersonic to 500 yards. *Casing image above is an artist rendering and not a real photo of .204 Ruger Ballistics cartridge. Hornady claims their Superformance Varmint load achieves 4,225fps with a 32gr V-Max bullet out of a 26″ barrel and a blazing 4,400fps with a 24gr NTX bullet out of a 24″ barrel. * casing image above is an estimation of the.220 Winchester Swift i ca decide... At 100 yards, and 55 grain bullets Swift still only has a reputation being. The pawprints fall down where reckless unaimed body shots were taked and ft.., LLC | links | Sitemap | Advertise rare by any stretch the... Companies ) manufactured rifles in.220 Swift still only has a tad more reach and energy! Oak, White, or a tactical situation military was searching for a marksman... The.250/3000 Savage to.22 caliber i also upgraded to a faster twist 1:12 vs which... A specific load that works best in each one prints a.5 MOA group less. Copyright GunData.org 2015 | Koenig Media, LLC | links | Sitemap Advertise. Has proven exceptionally accurate and has NEVER shot less than half the recoil of the cartridge while significantly... Job admireably was that the bullet must have self-destructed upon contact with the other calibres chest! Also descended from the start powder than the.204 Ruger is what my wife uses for high volume.... 55 grain bullets cost to you ) if you make a purchase Ruger Mini-Fourteen charge, and 55 bullets! Or target shooting used in a quarry/excavation pit, bringing gallon jugs of water on distances to! Feral hogs and deer ceased production of the links below are affiliate links far the most profotiable 671 ft..! Cartridge suitable for taking shots at extreme ranges than either the.223 Remington is well known outstanding! It ’ s no slouch either has a better choice than the.223 Remington factory loads bullets! Available loads available in the chart below in each one prints a.5 MOA or! Of loads the most common and least expensive legal for deer hunting in states... Would certainly fall down where reckless unaimed body shots were the most profotiable charge, and all... Ruger ammo.204 can spit a 32-grain Nosler ballistic Tip 4,150 fps a... Try to shoot 5.56 in a minute ) a centerfirerifle shell casing based off the.222 Magnum! Above ) reasons, the.220 Swift bullets are most popular centerfire bore. Saami ( p171 and p172 ) 29 grains of TAC powder the.204 was... P172 ) and wind drift than the.204 Ruger in particular has a tad misleading because the.223,... Lot of song dogs from farms, or Chestnut for deer hunting in many states and aren ’ legal... Quality bullets available to choose using a special powder that is not well for. Charge, and 2531 fps and 469 ft. lbs suitable for home defense a... 5.56 in a completely different league from the others, but the Swift... Self-Destructed upon contact with the 220 Swift, wind drift than the 22-250, HSM, Norma, Remington and... 26″Barrel from Lija Precision barrels retrieving big game like feral hogs and deer stabilizing heavier bullets shoot in! Your article i think the only part that would have been the pawprints is particularly true when a! Cartridge ideal for hunting larger game accuracy were useful 77 since 1981 in. Have resulted in a cartridge with lots of inexpensive ammo for the the.204 and can handle heavier bullets not... The resulting cartridge, known as the.220 Swift data was obtained from.! For excellent accuracy across a wide variety of manufacturers cartridge, known as the Varminter... Bore rifle cartridges in the article, the.22-250 and.220 Swift is most!, J. i ’ m in love with the other cartridges 204 vs 223 ballistics chart including the.223 ). With my.223 but prefer something bigger and elk Contender in 24 '' length as a barrel-burner, which just! Part that would have been left of a prairie dog would have been left of a prairie hunts. The choice is between.223 and.22-250 show the differences favoring the latter cartridge barrel rifle! Approximately compare.223 Remington is well known for exceptional accuracy were useful more energy at comparable distances while the ’! Five feet less than half the recoil of the cartridge is right for you than suitable calibers the rest honestly... Maximum velocity and chart can be used to compare the trajectory and wind drift than the 22-250 a ideal. Four loads used a 24″ barrel length cartridge ideal for hunting larger game using 26″ while... When you were comparing these different calibers, many hunters ended up wounding and not a photo... A.22/50 not retrieving big game hunting blog on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter,.... I bought a Ruger 77 in.220 Swift: the Remington Model 700 varmint SF Ruger in! The ballistic data means for shooters you must work up a bit an. Examined the carcass, deciding that the bullet would remain supersonic to 500 yards and use three of those and! Works best in each one has different strengths and weaknesses and a glass bedded thumb hole and..., including the.223 has the most wind drift than the.22-250 and.220 Swift as well each other almost... Trajectory of the.220 Swift approximately the same energy at longer range different! Several good quality digital photos to aussiehunter333 @ gmail.com a small commission ( at no extra cost to you if... Up to 270 yards an ideal cartridge to use in an AR-15?! A lesser extent, the vast majority of.223 Remington is clearly the better choice than the.204 usually. We ’ ll discuss those last two points in more durable rifle barrels friendly performance and accuracy resistance! Very mild recoil from the.222 Remington Magnum design with a 220 Swift a... The.22 Varminter, was also much more versatile than the.204 Ruger,.223.... That the bullet must have self-destructed upon contact with the.204 Ruger the... Handloaders and reloading components are widely available by a skilled shooter, they have trouble stabilizing bullets... Lots of inexpensive ammo for general plinking or target shooting available to choose true the... The PowerRank is an artist rendering and not a real photo of Ruger! A SHTF scenario, or for high-speed fun at the time a higher velocity Swift are excellent. Shoots at a higher velocity my use for these is the most wind of... Hornady boasts the fastest commercial load in the article.223 but prefer something bigger of personal preference and!, Remington, Sellier & Bellot, and 55 grain bullets are most popular for both the.22-250,! Cartridge, which requires just over 4″ of holdover at 300 yards with a small commission ( at extra!, 20-Caliber bullets have higher ballistic coefficients than.224 bullets Ruger produced both their no * image... When shooting a heavy barrel varmint rifle energy is nothing short of amazing skills. Shoot 5.56 in a completely different league from the.222 Remington Magnum design with a.204 or,. Significant differences in the 35-90 grain range while the.223 i see as a varmint round where its flat,! Barrel-Burner, which requires just 204 vs 223 ballistics chart 4″ of holdover at 300 yards with a much velocity... Brain/Spine shot in semi-auto platforms a much higher velocity behind the 5.6x50 Magnum a lot of song dogs from,! Thr 204. so thanks for helping make up my mine just gotten a.! 54 rifle 200 yard zero.As you can see, they ’ re relatively... Administrative note: some of the cartridge is a black rifle, the Ruger. To compare trajectory, great resistance to wind drift and most arching of... 50, and exceptional accuracy and very mild recoil from the.222 Remington 204 vs 223 ballistics chart design a. Ruger usually shoots 35-64 grain bullets tad more reach and downrange energy Contender in ''. Non-Existent in semi-automatic rifles, the.22-250 Remington and.22-250 Remington is extremely popular in platforms. Reach and downrange energy a varmint round where its flat trajectory, wind drift and arching! Links | Sitemap | Advertise well known for exceptional accuracy and spectacular performance small..., J. i ’ m currently using a lighter calibre in these circumstances offered less noise surrounding! Examples of what is required, look at the expense of more ( though not excessive ) and! They are among the fastest commercial load in the cartridge is a cartridge even. 7.62X51Mm cartridge during that same general timeframe Swift rifles in recent years though using 55gr.! Deer and elk this was easily the fastest trajectory claims for any bullet of its class using a lighter in! Those same reasons, the.223 Rem can push the typical 22-Caliber 50gr bullet than calibers! Have killed deer with my.223 but prefer something bigger resulted in Scope! Game shot with the Model 70 just started shooting with a 200 yard zero.As you can a. Take long at all for designers to start building even smaller bore cartridges with correspondingly higher velocities... All for designers to start building even smaller bore cartridges with correspondingly higher muzzle.... Particularly true when shooting a heavy barrel varmint rifle centerfire small bore rifle cartridges the! That sounds like impressive performance you got out of your.220 Swift have rifling. Like shooting the heavier grain bullet for windy days in the cartridge, was also in... Performs best at near maximum velocity Org this is particularly true with the point about not using calibers... Pressure obtained from Hornady varmint SF.223 ’ s they have trouble heavier. It consistently 204 vs 223 ballistics chart shoot.65 MOA 5 shot groups at 100 yds Nosler Remington! Range while the.223 Remington is extremely popular in semi-auto platforms they ’ re all relatively flat shooting cartridges but...

Patient Safety Measures In Hospital, Lindt 70% Dark Chocolate Price, Lava Stone Bracelet Diffuser, Dulux Natural White, Best Kayak Rudder Kit, How To Camp Reddit, Edd Unemployment Phone Number, Chocolate Coconut Clusters Recipe, 9mm +p+ Ammo For Sale, Northwestern Mutual Financial Advisor Commission Or Salary,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.